下面是小编为大家收集的GMAT写作Issue优秀作文，本文共19篇，仅供参考，欢迎大家阅读，希望可以帮助到有需要的朋友。本文原稿由网友“续集”提供。
篇1：GMAT写作Issue优秀作文
GMAT写作Issue优秀作文
Should employees leave their personal lives entirely behind them when they enter the workplace, as the speaker suggests here? While I agree that employees should not allow their personal lives to interfere with their jobs, the speaker fails to consider that integrating personal life with work can foster a workplace ambiance that helps everyone do a better job, thereby promoting success for the organization.
Engaging coworkers in occasional conversation about personal interests and activities can help build collegiality among coworkers that adds to their sense of common purpose on the job. Managers would be well advised to participate in and perhaps even plan the sharing of personal informationas a leadership tool as well as a morale booster. An employee feels valued when the boss takes time to ask about the employees family or recent vacation. The employee, in turn, is likely to be more loyal to and cooperative with the boss. Company-sponsored social events picnics, parties, excursions, and so forthalso help to produce greater cohesiveness in an organization, by providing opportunities for employees to bond with one another in ways that translate into better working relationships.
Admittedly, employees should guard against allowing their personal life to impinge upon their job performance or intrude on coworkers. Excessive chatting about nun business topics, frequent personal telephone calls, and the like, are always distracting. And romances between coworkers are best kept confidential, at least to the extent they disrupt work or demoralize or offend other employees. By the same token, however, employees who are too aloofsharing nothing personal with othersmay be resented by coworkers who perceive them as arrogant, unfriendly, or uncooperative. The ill-will and lack of communication that is likely to result may ultimately harm the organization.
篇2：GMAT写作5.5分作文
GMAT写作5.5分作文模板
In this argument, the author concludes that To support his conclusion, the author points out that. In addition, the author reasons that Further more, he also assumes that . At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.
In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that . However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that .. It is likely that , it is also likely that Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that Therefore, this argument in question nee not to be accepted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of after this and therefore because of this. In no case can the mere fact that be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A doesnot necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as, or may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to , this assumption in question can not be accepted.
篇3：GMAT考试写作参考作文
GMAT考试写作参考作文
The following appeared as part of an article in a photography magazine.
When choosing whether to work in color or in black-and-white, the photographer who wishes to be successful should keep in mind that because color photographs are more true-to-life, magazines use more color photographs than black-and-white ones, and many newspapers are also starting to use color photographs. The realism of color also accounts for the fact that most portrait studios use more color film than black-and-white film. Furthermore, there are more types of color film than black-and-white film available today. Clearly, photographers who work in color have an advantage over those who work in black-and-white.
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
The author concludes that photographers who work in color hold a competitive advantage over those who work in black-and-white. To support this conclusion, the author claims that the greater realism of color accounts for its predominant use in magazines and portraits. The author also points out that newspapers now use color photographs, and that there are more types of color film than black-and-white film available today. This argument is problematic in several important respects.
First, the argument unfairly assumes that working in color is necessary in order to gain an advantage. The author identifies only two areasmagazine and portrait photographywhere color predominates. It is possible that the overall demand for black-and-white photography remains high. Moreover, the author provides no evidence that the realism of color photography is the reason for its predominance. The predominant use of color may be due to other factorssuch as consumer preferences or relative costs of filmwhich might change at any time.
篇4：GMAT作文写作的方法
GMAT作文写作的方法
首先，我们要浏览GMAT作文题目、审题并写出开头段。
审题和开头段同时进行，一边看题一边写。这不是回避逻辑错误，GMAT考试而是将审题、找错和写作有机地结合。第一段的任务无非就是指出论题的结论、假设、论据，并指出题目有错误。同学们会发现，在我们写作第一段的时候，逻辑错误会不断的涌现出来，而当我们把有问题的假设以及原论证的逻辑结构清理以后，该论证所存在的所有问题也就都暴露出来了。
在写完开头段并审好题后，大家要趁着头脑清醒，把主要的逻辑问题都打出来。
原文可能出现六七个逻辑错误，而大家只需要从中挑出3-4个最主要的进行有利的`攻击就可以了。因为GMAT 写作能不能拿高分，直接取决于与你能否抓住主要逻辑错误。也就是说，如果你忽视了非常致命的逻辑错误，那么即使你把其它的错误批驳得再好，所用的语言再美，字数再多，最后照样不及格。有人担心是不是要把所有的错误都清理出来，实际上大家只要把主要的错误都清理出来，进行有利的攻击，同样可以拿到六分，正如ETS的六分例文一样。这样做的另一个好处是可以节约时间，因为考生在正文写作时往往会把顺手的段落大写特写，力争在某点上把敌人驳的体无完肤，但是等到意识到有其它的重要逻辑错误未被谈及的时候，时间却已经到了。而首先列出提纲则可以提醒我们点到为止，切实做到合理分配时间。与其把一个问题分析的特别透彻，不如把所有的主要问题都涉及到，即使不很透彻，也比前者要好。简而言之，Argument这部分展开批驳的时候，与其断其一指，不如伤其四指。
篇5：GRE作文：ISSUE写作策略
GRE作文：ISSUE写作策略
Analysis of IssueIn the Analysis of Issue question you discuss your opinion toward an issue.
You write a well-balanced analysis of the issue the test presents to you.
These are the most common topics:
The most common topics relate to general business and public policy issues.
Business issues generally relate to business ethics, marketing and labor.
Government issues will generally relate to regulatory issues and social
welfare issues.
Here is an example of an Analysis of Issue question:
Following the Colorado massacre of schoolchildren, many lawmakers have
proposed that an international body regulate the internet so that sites
which provide information to terrorists should be eliminated.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the above opinion.
Support your opinion with reasons and examples.
The people who grade the Analysis of Issue expect the following:
i) A well-developed essay that is logical and coherent;
ii) An essay that demonstrates critical thinking skills;
iii) An essay which uses varied sentence structure and vocabulary;
iv) An essay that uses the language of standard written English;
v) An essay that is free of mechanical errors in spelling, punctuation,
capitalization; and
vi) An essay that follows the conventions of standard written English.
a. Analysis of Issue: Content
How do I write a well-balanced essay?
You should always acknowledge both sides of an issue. Among the sample
essays there is not one irrefutable essay, yet you must pick a side. The
trick to doing this is to persuade the reader that, despite the counter-
arguments, your position is the strongest one overall.
Try to “straddle the fence” between both sides of the issue by making
limited use of qualifiers. This will allow you to acknowledge the opposing
view and appear scholarly. (Note that overuse of qualifiers will make the
essay appear too vague and dilute an argument you are making.)
In general, take a politically correct opinion or an opinion that a
majority of top scorers might take. However, if you do not think you can
write an effective politically-correct essay, adjust your content to fit
what you can comfortably express. In general, though, stay uncontroversial
and balanced. Do not use it as a forum to be an ideologue. Writing a highly
charged essay might evoke a bias from the reader (if he disagrees with you)
and it also may confuse the E-rater, since you essay will not resemble any
essays it has stored in its database. Try to approach each issue in a
dispassionate and balanced manner.
Nevertheless, you must be sure to take a stand. You must pick a side that
will “win out” in the conclusion/introduction. The test instructions
specifically tell you to pick a side. Make sure to disagree or agree with
the question's statement.
Note: Do not write an unsubstantiated opinion, write an argument that
consists of your thesis and logical arguments to support it.
How in-depth should the essays be?
Your essay is short (you have only 45 minutes), so you won't be able to
cover every possible argument, rebuttal and example. When you start the
test set aside a few minutes to set up the points and examples. You do not
have to cover every idea/concept. Most essay students do not have time to
cover everything they would like to cover. Choose the most persuasive
relevant points and examples to use. The essay graders do not expect you to
go in-depth on every topic.
The most important concern here is that you do not go off of the main
subject. Stay focused on the topic. Do not either go off on tangential
arguments or excessively focus on one example.
Where should I get examples?
The instructions (with only a few exceptions) allow you to draw upon your
personal experiences in developing your answer to each essay question. This
practice is acceptable, but don't overdo it. You should generally rely more
on academic knowledge than personal experiences.
Your examples and knowledge can be impressive, but you shouldn't go too
far. Don't try to impress the grader with your expertise in a narrow area.
The AWA tests analytical writing, not specific subject knowledge.
Where do I get essay issue ideas?
These questions generally favor students who have taken government policy
analysis courses. This section favors the student who flips to the
editorial page of the Wall St. Journal before the Marketplace section.
to get an idea about public policy issues, try Policy Review, the Wall
Street Journal editorial page or the Economist.
International Students: Read these American magazines as much as possible
to see how Americans structure their writing and to stay updated on issues.
Write with your grader in mind
When you write your Issue essay, remember that you are fundamentally
writing your essay to please your grader.
Keep it concise
Put yourself in the position of a grader. They grade essays all day.
Wouldn't you favor a concise and effective essay with 5 paragraphs of 4
sentences each more than a 4 paragraph rambling essay with 10 sentences in
each paragraph? The bottom line: keep the essays crisp, concise, and
written in a manner appealing to the grader. This is particularly important
on the Analysis of Issue question, where you essay expresses personal
opinions.
b. Analysis of Issue: Structure
Structure is the most important part of your essay. Your essay must be
written in a standard format with the standard logical transitions. The E-
rater will scan your essay to identify if it has a standard structure.
Introduction/Conclusion- These elements will provide the structure for your
essay and keep you on track.
Number of Paragraphs. To satisfy the E-rater, your essay should be 4 to 5
paragraphs: an introduction, a conclusion, and three “body” paragraphs.
Each paragraph should have 2 to 5 sentences (total essay about 300-400
words).
Note: You should skip a line between paragraphs since the TAB key does not
function in the essay section.
Essay Template
The template is just a guideline. You do not have to adhere to it. Often
you will have to make changes to suit your argument.
The numbers of sentences indicated for each paragraph is a guideline that
varies depending on how much content you have.
The transitional phrases we use in the Template are intentionally
simplistic. This is not a simple approach where you can “fill-in-the-
blanks.” Flesh out the template somewhat and use it as a guideline to write
a disciplined and focused essay.
Template
1) Introductory Paragraph (2-4 sentences)
Make sure to keep your introductory paragraph concise, strong and effective.
What the introductory paragraph should accomplish:
Explain the issue (briefly).
Show that you understand the full complexities of the issue (for example,
by recognizing competing interests or various factors).
State your position on the issue (without the details yet).
Sample template for introductory paragraph (2 sentences):
a) Whether ________________________ depends on _____________________.
b) (insert your opinion), __________________________.
2) First Body Paragraph (3-5 sentences)
Begin to develop your position with your most important reason. Use one or
two examples to back up your main point:
a) The chief reason for my view is ___________________________________.
b) For example, __
篇6：GMAT考试优秀作文
GMAT考试优秀作文
This newspaper editorial concludes that our city should build a plant for burning trash in order to avoid the serious health threats associated with many landfills. The author adds that an incinerator could offer economic benefits as well, since incinerators can be adapted to generate small amounts of electricity for other uses, and since ash residue from some kinds of trash can be used as a soil conditioner. Even if these claims are true, the authors argument is unconvincing in three important respects.
To begin with, the author fails to consider health threats posed by incinerating trash. It is possible, for example, that respiratory problems resulting from the air pollution caused by burning trash might be so extensive that they would outweigh the health risks associated with landfills. If so, the authors conclusion that switching to incineration would be more salutary for public health would be seriously undermined.
Secondly, the author assumes that discontinuing landfill operations would abate the heath threats they now pose. However, this is not necessarily the case. It is possible that irreversible environmental damage to subterranean water supplies, for example, has already occurred. In this event, changing from landfills to incinerators might not avoid or abate serious public health problems.
篇7：GMAT优秀作文素材
GMAT优秀作文素材
The author concludes that the local transit company must either reduce tares for the shuttle buses that transport people to then- subway stations or increase parking fees at the stations. The reasons offered to support this conclusionare that commuter use of the subway train is exceeding the transit companys expectations, while commuter use of the shuffle buses is below projected volume. This argument is unconvincing because the author oversimplifies the problem and its solutions in a number of ways.
To begin with, by concluding that the transit company must either reduce shuttle fares or increase parking fees, the author assumes that these are the only available solutions to the problem of limited shuttle use. However, it is possible that other factors-such as inconvenient shuttle routing and/or scheduling, safety concerns, or an increase in carpoolscontribute to the problem. If so, adjusting fares or parking fees would might not solve the problem.
In addition, the author assumes that reducing shuttle fees and increasing parking fees are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either/or choice. Adjusting both shuttle fares and parking fees might produce better results. Moreover, if the author is wrong in the assumption that parking fees and shuttle fees are the only possible causes of the problem, then the most effective solution might include a complex of policy changesfor example, in shuttle fares, parking fees, rerouting, and rescheduling.
篇8：GMAT优秀英文作文
GMAT优秀英文作文
The most important reason for studying history is not that knowledge of history can make us better people or a better society but that it can provide clues to solving the societal problems that we face today.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Examining history makes us better people insofar as it helps us to understand our world. It would seem, therefore, that history would also provide useful clues for dealing with the same social ills that have plagued societies throughout history. On balance, however, the evidence suggests otherwise.
Admittedly, history has helped us learn the appropriateness of addressing certain issues, particularly moral ones, on a societal level. Attempts to legislate morality invariably fail, as illustrated by Prohibition in the 1930s and, more recently, failed federal legislation to regulate access to adult material via the Internet. We are slowly learning this lesson, as the recent trend toward legalization of marijuana for medicinal purposes and the recognition of equal rights for same-sex partners both demonstrate.
篇9：GMAT优秀作文摘抄
GMAT优秀作文摘抄
Scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The speaker argues that because scientists continually shift viewpoints about how our actions affect the natural environment, companies should not change their products and processes according to scientific recommendations until the government requires them to do so. This argument raises complex issues about the duties of business and about regulatory fairness and effectiveness. Although a wait-and-see policy may help companies avoid costly and unnecessary changes, three countervailing considerations compel me to disagree overall with the argument.
First, a regulatory system of environmental protection might not operate equitably. At first glance, a wait-and-see response might seem fair in that all companies would be subject to the same standards and same enforcement measures. However, enforcement requires detection, and while some violators may be caught, others might not. Moreover, a broad regulatory system imposes general standards that may not apply equitably to every company. Suppose, for example, that pollution from a company in a valley does more damage to the environment than similar pollution from a company on the coast. It would seem unfair to require the coastal company to invest as heavily in abatement or, in the extreme , to shut down the operation if the company cannot afford abatement measures.
篇10：GMAT优秀作文欣赏
GMAT优秀作文欣赏
The vice president of Nostrum argues that implementing an increase in health and retirement benefits for employees is not a good idea at this time. His main line of reasoning s that an increase in benefits is both financially unjustified and unnecessaryfinancially unjustified because last years profits were lower than the preceding years, and unnecessary because Nostrums chief competitor offers lower benefits to its employees and because a recent Nostrum employee survey indicates that two-thirds of the respondents viewed the current benefits package favorably While the argument has some merit, it is not completely convincing.
Admittedly the vice presidents reasoning linking employee benefits with company profits seems reasonable on its face. Companies that are not profitable are ill-advised to take on additional costs such as increased employee benefits. However, the fact that Nostrums profits last year were lower than the preceding year does not imply that Nostrum is experiencing financial difficulties that preclude it from increasing employee benefits at this time. Perhaps the previous years profits were extremely large; whereas last years profits, albeit lower, were sufficient to fund an increase in the benefits package without threatening the companys bottom line.
篇11：GMAT考试优秀作文
GMAT考试优秀作文
In this editorial, the author argues that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer, in support of this claim the author reasons that since wages paid to employees should increase as the risk of physical injury increases, the converse should be true as well. Hence, by decreasing the risk of injury, employers could decrease the wages paid to workers and thereby save money. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons.
To begin with the author assumes that because companies would agree that as risk of injury increases wages should also increase, they would also agree that as risk decreases wages should also decrease accordingly. This is tantamount to the assumption that risk of injury is the primary factor that determines workers wages. It is obvious that few employers, and even fewer employees, would agree that this is the case. To adopt this position one would have to disregard education, experience, and skill as equally important factors in determining the wages paid to workers.
Secondly, the authors reasoning suggests that the only benefit of a safer workplace is the savings employers could realize from lower wages. This is obviously not true. The costs associated with accidents on the job could far outweigh any savings that could be realized by paying workers lower wages.
篇12：GRE写作ISSUE作文评分标准解析
GRE写作ISSUE作文评分标准解析 规定时间内写出高分作文要做到这几点
GRE作文评分比标准
GRE作文满分为6分，以0.5分为最小计分单位，作文成绩单独计算，不计入语文数学部分的总分，对于大部分学校来说，4.5分左右的作文成绩就已经是比较好的分数，部分文科类专业也可能要求更高的分数。
GRE写作Issue满分评分标准解读
In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
1.articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
2.develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
3.sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
4.conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
5.demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English(i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors。
标准解读 要点 1： articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
关键词：insightful ，position，in accordance with
1. insightful即Data Mining(数据挖掘)。
GRE写作强调思辨，挖掘题目的核心概念十分必要。 例如GRE作文题库中有一道题目：事物的差异性重要还是相似性重要? “insightful”的分析应当是通过similarity 和 difference的现象看到背后所体现的本质--矛盾(paradox)的思想。 具体来说就是要学会观察相似事物的差异性，以及差异事物的相似性，辩证地分析事物。 因此本题真正考查的是“看待事物的方法论”, 而非简单的选择“哪一个重要”。
2. position
在GRE issue写作里，position不等于attitude，即立场不等于态度。 这又是GRE作文中对于逻辑辩证点的考查。 很多高分GRE文章都是对一个事物的利弊进行具体问题的具体分析，而非进行倾向性的态度传递，这也符合事物的基本规律，即任何事物都具有两面性。 TOEFL独立写作非常强调态度的传达，但GRE作文更强调分析事物的方法论和论证过程。
3. in accordance with
指切题(on-topic)的论述：论点、论据，论证要和题目要求一致，这个评分点和上文中insightful的要求一脉相承。 许多GRE issue题目的含义很难依赖字面意思来理解， 题目的“隐藏逻辑”和“隐藏含义”要求考生首先要准确地“审题”、思考题面背后的含义， 然后选择相关的论点和论据进行支撑。
要点 2： develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
关键词：reasons, persuasive
1. reasons=reasoning
GRE作文强调推理，并且推理的过程远重要于推理的结果。在GRE作文里，解释Why比给出What 更重要，因为考官是通过审视推理过程来判断考生的逻辑陈述能力。 因此建议考生在准备GRE作文时，应把重点放在分析推理上，而不是频频给出各类结论。
2. persuasive=relevant
在GRE作文里，考生给出的所有例证都要有说服力。要有说服力，首先要与文中的论证相关。无论例证是来自西方世界还是中国，相关的例子才是和论证匹配的内容。
要点 3： sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
关键词：analysis, logically
1. analysis
GRE写作强调论述过程与分析过程，而非结论本身。
2. logically
“GRE写作的逻辑”包含形式逻辑和内容逻辑: 形式逻辑就是指文章起承转合的逻辑信号、逻辑连接词。它们连接不同的内容,使行文显得有层次。内容逻辑就是指文章含义推导过程的严密性，和我们后文即将解读的排序方式是高度相关的。
要点 4： conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
关键词：effective, variety
1. effective
有效的--所谓有效的词汇，是指根据语境所选择“恰当的用词”。 在GRE写作里考生不需要哗众取宠地用“大词、难词”来显示词汇量。 真正的高手能够用简单而精确的词语来阐述深刻的道理。
2. variety
用词用句的变化性能有效地体现行文语言的多样性。
要点 5： demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors
关键词：standard written English, may have minor errors
1. standard written English
即使用标准的书面英语。英语口语体不合适用于GRE这类准学术型的分析性写作中。 因此考生应注意标准的书面英语的语法，用词和文法。
2. may have minor errors
GRE作文允许有错误的存在。 考官认为，一篇满分的文章可以有错误，尤其是个别的拼写错误、语法错误和用词不当。这不影响一篇文章得高分。只要这篇文章准确地提炼了要点、做到了精确的对应匹配、逻辑性强、语言水平高即可。
GRE Issue写作范文详细解析
Issue
“People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.”
Sample Essay
Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of “synergy”, where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.
Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic “Type A” personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.
Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.
Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole “sum” but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.
Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.
Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.
观点陈述型作文/[题目]
“当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效。团队的协同工作需要相互合作，它比个人竞争更能激励人们。”
[范文正文]
总体而言，团队的协同工作自然能通过“增效作用”(Synergy)这一理念而带来更高程度的整体生产效率，因为在这里，整体大于个体相加之总和。然则，“当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效”这一观念注定会产生巨大差异，取决于所组织起来的团队的类别，团队与个人所能获得的终极回报或激励，以及个人本身。
关于个人，有些人天生就具有获取成功的欲望，无论他们所面临的情形或任务是什么。这些人会演变为工作狂这一经典的“A类”人格，因为受到一股内心的热火所驱使，这股热火时刻告诉他们必须不停地“有所事事”，无论是作为个人抑或是作为团队的一分子。另一些人则可能希望不必那么多地介入社会，或者他们倾向于与其他人激烈竞争。对这些人而言，作为个人，他们工作起来会最富有成效，因为由于他们根本就不想成为任何团队的一部分，与他人合作便会限制他们的效率。这一思想倾向是否与生俱有，还是随着时间的推移而形成，这都无关紧要。这仅仅只是他们的一种生存状态，无论是动机还是回报，都无法在其内心深处激发起作为一个团队集体工作的欲望。
有些人，由于社会互动以及与他人协作去实现某种集体努力的欲望，而具有极强的动机。显然，这些个人在作为团队的一部分进行工作时，他们便会处在其最富有成效的状态。组织行为学研究表明，亚洲文化更有可能形成此类集体性行为，与那种常和西方文化联系在一起的较为个人主义的行为构成对比。这样，人们自然会认为，某些文化价值观可以决定人们是否作为个人还是作为团队的一部分工作起来最富有成效。
GRE满分作文分析
题目：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so. To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think most people would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
分析：
字数：651
语言：平实的语句完全没有网络流行模板的痕迹，也是许多过了6级的考生通过练习可以达到的水平。
I must say that I reject this statement.
Does that mean that we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt.
Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
……
当然，这并不意味，在GRE作文考试中，平实的语言比润色后的语言有更多的优势。从这篇作文中，我们可以得到以下两条重要信息：
1、通过记忆大量模板使语言“全副武装”、“气势汹汹”并非高分作文的必要条件，这种方式的弊端在课堂上我们已阐述过。
2、在陈述idea的过程中，体现出critical thinking才是成功的关键。我们在课堂上对critical thinking这一概念做过多次详细的解释，现在请大家一起来体会这一概念在文中的运用。
第一段：
(表明立场)I must say that I reject this statement. (让步)While it is true that we need to support society as much as possible with current technology, (折回自己立场)that does not in any way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our current technology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it.
第二段：
(概述科技的两面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具体讨论科技的贡献)Without it, we would never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made even better. (具体讨论科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. (表明已考虑到科技的危害，但是依然坚持自己立场)And yet, I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
第三段：
(提出反方的立场)Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通过具体论据反驳反方的观点)But upon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really make people happy?
第四段：
(在第三段驳论的基础上进一步立论)What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
第五段：
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. (指出支持观点存在的一点不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解决方案)We have to allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to the hospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would have happened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existing technology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have made those discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.
篇13：GMAT考试的优秀作文
关于GMAT考试的优秀作文精选
为了方便广大考生更好的'复习，综合整理了备考资料：GMAT优秀作文精选，以供各位考生考试复习参考,希望对考生复习有所帮助。
This ad recommends non-prescription Acid-Ease over non-prescription Pepticaid for relief of excess stomach acid. The only reason offered is that doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for the full-strength prescription form of Acid-Ease than for full-strength Pepticaid. While this reason is relevant, and provides some grounds for preferring Acid-Ease over Pepticaid, it is insufficient as it stands because it depends on three unwarranted assumptions.
The first assumption is that the prescription form of Acid-Ease is more popular among doctors. But this might not be the case, even though doctors have written 76 million more prescriptions for Acid-Ease. Acid-Ease may have been available for several more years than Pepticaid; and in the years when both products were available, Pepticaid might have actually been prescribed more often than Acid-Ease.
The second assumption is that doctors prefer the prescription form of Acid-Ease for the reason that it is in fact more effective at relieving excess stomach acid. However, doctors may have preferred Acid-Ease for reasons other than its effectiveness. Perhaps Acid-Ease is produced by a larger, more familiar drug company or by one that distributes more free samples. For that matter, the medical community may have simply been mistaken in thinking that Acid-Ease was more effective. In short, the number of prescriptions by itself is not conclusive as to whether one product is actually better than another.
篇14：Issue的优秀作文解析
关于Issue的优秀作文解析
题目：If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 只要值得，不择手段达到目的是合理的`。
正文：
The speaker claim that if a goal if worthwhile, then any means taken to achieve this goal is justifiable. Although the assertion makes sense when we consider the underlying of this implication is that whatever the conditions, the natures of the endings deserve our effort wholehearted. But if we examine the broad meaning that this claim carries, we find this threshold statement suffer deficiencies from many aspects of consideration.
First let define the worthiness of a goal. How worthwhile and valuable a goal is lies not only in the subjective meditation and evaluation of an individual, we must consider the interactive influence exerted by this goal on others.
For example, a country may consider the goal of achieving economic success and well being of its citizens to be worthwhile, but if we know they exploit cheap labor forces in third-world country,utilize scarce natural resources that being exported from poor countries, or dump low-cost goods in these countries, our morals reveal us the dark side of the goal and make it less worthwhile than it seems to be to its home people. On a personal level, a persons food might be the otherspoison, so did the goal.
Consider the ambition of Napoleon, his ambitious goal is to conquer the whole European Continent, which considered by himself and many of his follows to be the most glorious plan they have ever made. But by resorting to wars, killings, and blood shedding, their sweet dream turn out to be the nightmare of people habituating in this continent. In a word, since no goal is set from a pure disinterested, impartial perspective, it is necessary to bear the interwoven relationship in mind before targeting at a certain goal.
Even if a goal is worthwhile agreed by majority of people, we should consider cost-and-benefit side of things in an effort to obtaining an nonbiased, all-around point of view. Most people today agree that the exploration of outer space is a worthy goal considering the valuable research materials we would get from for our physics and medial experiment and weather forecast.
What is more, due to the limit longevity of earth and the ever increasing of populations, we see high calls to find another habitat for our future generations. Even if all the advantages and benefits involved justify the worthiness of this goal, not all means taken would be considered as sensible and judicial. Since most pressing social problem such as AIDS prevention, poverty,environmental problems still in need of immediate attention and observation, we need to allocate most of our resources to tackle these problems.
As a result, even if one way of achieving the breakthrough in out space exploration would be to devote all research staff and available resource to this project, we have to struggle a balance between the worthiness of a goal and the proper way to obtain this goal.
篇15：GRE写作ISSUE作文怎么写?四点建议
GRE写作ISSUE作文怎么写?四点建议分享
ISSUE作文常见难点分析
自GRE考试改革以来，很多考生感到茫然，特别是新gre写作的ISSUE部分，很多ISSUE作文题目的原论点都经过特殊设计，而面对ISSUE题目写不好的根本原因往往是审题不对以及论证素材和论据素材太少，以至于考生向外输出的内容过于空洞乏味，写不出充实丰富又文笔流畅的好文章。
ISSUE作文写作建议：审题上抓住关键词具体化展开
ISSUE作文常会出一些概念抽象的题目，而考生有时会觉得有些题目无从下手，这个时候考生千万不能以抽象对抽象，而应该抓住某个关键词展开从而具体化，这样论证才有力度，更有说服力。比如有一道题目是关于人们追求knowledge还是追求certainty这个问题，考生就可以具体化分领域分学科展开来写，在领域学科不必面面俱到，只需要选几个典型的而且自己有把握能够说得清楚的领域就好，如此就可以做到有话可说，言之有物。
ISSUE作文写作建议：具体论证上要逻辑严密
从一个论点展开数个分论点是ISSUE作文的常见写法，但切忌东一锤子西一棒子的想到那里写到哪里。分论点之间最好有逻辑上的连续性，内容上也能相互关联，做到整体结构的流畅自然，逻辑上的通顺严谨。能否做到这一点直接体现了考生对整个题目的把握程度，也是考官在批阅ISSUE文章时关注的重点。如果能在逻辑上做到无懈可击，得分自然不会低。
ISSUE作文写作建议：长难句运用应量力而行
GRE阅读的长难句也是GRE考试的一个难点，可能会有考生觉得这么写会让文章显得高大上。但实际上，以考生的水平要驾驭长难句难度很高，如果没有足够的功底不要轻易为之。如果我们能用一句非常简单的话表述一个相对复杂的意思，那还是建议大家使用简单句，这样才更体现出考生对语言的掌控能力。很多考生经常犯的错误是把状语从句随意地并列在一起，然后把宾语从句也并得很长，拼凑出跟GRE阅读长难句很像的句子，殊不知反而是东施效颦，句子中的语法错误一大堆，没有成为得分点，反而成了扣分的靶子。而如果实在想写复杂的长难句，考生也一定要把握好句子的重心，让其最好出现在前面，而不要太绕，让读者读了几个状语和定语之后才看到你的真正的主谓宾等。
ISSUE作文写作建议：ISSUE作文一定要列提纲
论证要求较高的ISSUE作文，在开始写之前一定要列出较为详细的写作提纲。否则，在考场如果遇到没有思考过的题目，很容易乱了阵脚，临场去想，导致失败。此外，新GRE的ISSUE写作题目最好在考前就按题材分类写好提纲，至少要做到知道题目的对立面和大致写作思路，同时准备一些在同类题目中通用的论据例子，以便考试时随时取用。
关于GRE考试ISSUE作文的一些写作建议，就为大家介绍到这里，希望大家能够好好准备ISSUE作文的写作，为考试做好准备。
TIPS：新GRE作文字数要求
字数太少的文章势必低分，因为字数太少，很难将一个问题阐述的非常清楚，尤其是ISSUE。按照考试经验，550---650的ISSUE字数往往最有效。而不是写得越多越好。有些考生，文章写得冗长无比，其实思路混乱，没有逻辑性。这种文章，势必低分。所以，ISSUE作文要拿到高分，关键还是要看文章的组织架构是否合理，论点的展开是否恰当，论证是否有力、到位。这些要求需要一定的字数做保障，但不绝对。至于ARGUMENT，一般来说，字数400以上基本就够了。ARGU的关键是要能准确的找出逻辑错误，并恰当的给予反驳，重点还是在于内容，把要说的观点都写清楚即可，字数同样不需要强求。
GRE写作ISSUE作文满分评分标准解读
GRE ISSUE作文满分评分标准
In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
1.articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
2.develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
3.sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
4.conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
5.demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English(i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors。
评分标准解读
要点1：articulates a clear and insightful position on the issue in accordance with the assigned task
关键词：insightful ，position，in accordance with
1. insightful即Data Mining(数据挖掘)。
GRE写作强调思辨，挖掘题目的核心概念十分必要。 例如GRE作文题库中有一道题目：事物的差异性重要还是相似性重要? “insightful”的分析应当是通过similarity 和 difference的现象看到背后所体现的本质--矛盾(paradox)的思想。 具体来说就是要学会观察相似事物的差异性，以及差异事物的相似性，辩证地分析事物。 因此本题真正考查的是“看待事物的方法论”, 而非简单的选择“哪一个重要”。
2. position
在GRE issue写作里，position不等于attitude，即立场不等于态度。 这又是GRE作文中对于逻辑辩证点的考查。 很多高分GRE文章都是对一个事物的利弊进行具体问题的具体分析，而非进行倾向性的态度传递，这也符合事物的基本规律，即任何事物都具有两面性。 TOEFL独立写作非常强调态度的传达，但GRE作文更强调分析事物的方法论和论证过程。
3. in accordance with
指切题(on-topic)的论述：论点、论据，论证要和题目要求一致，这个评分点和上文中insightful的要求一脉相承。 许多GRE issue题目的含义很难依赖字面意思来理解， 题目的“隐藏逻辑”和“隐藏含义”要求考生首先要准确地“审题”、思考题面背后的含义， 然后选择相关的论点和论据进行支撑。
要点2：develops the position fully with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
关键词：reasons, persuasive
1. reasons=reasoning
GRE作文强调推理，并且推理的过程远重要于推理的结果。在GRE作文里，解释Why比给出What 更重要，因为考官是通过审视推理过程来判断考生的逻辑陈述能力。 因此建议考生在准备GRE作文时，应把重点放在分析推理上，而不是频频给出各类结论。
2. persuasive=relevant
在GRE作文里，考生给出的所有例证都要有说服力。要有说服力，首先要与文中的论证相关。无论例证是来自西方世界还是中国，相关的例子才是和论证匹配的内容。
要点3：sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
关键词：analysis, logically
1. analysis
GRE写作强调论述过程与分析过程，而非结论本身。
2. logically
“GRE写作的逻辑”包含形式逻辑和内容逻辑: 形式逻辑就是指文章起承转合的逻辑信号、逻辑连接词。它们连接不同的内容,使行文显得有层次。内容逻辑就是指文章含义推导过程的严密性，和我们后文即将解读的排序方式是高度相关的。
要点4：conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
关键词：effective, variety
1. effective
有效的--所谓有效的词汇，是指根据语境所选择“恰当的用词”。 在GRE写作里考生不需要哗众取宠地用“大词、难词”来显示词汇量。 真正的高手能够用简单而精确的词语来阐述深刻的道理。
2. variety
用词用句的变化性能有效地体现行文语言的多样性。
要点5：demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage and mechanics), but may have minor errors
关键词：standard written English, may have minor errors
1. standard written English
即使用标准的书面英语。英语口语体不合适用于GRE这类准学术型的分析性写作中。 因此考生应注意标准的书面英语的语法，用词和文法。
2. may have minor errors
GRE作文允许有错误的存在。 考官认为，一篇满分的文章可以有错误，尤其是个别的拼写错误、语法错误和用词不当。这不影响一篇文章得高分。只要这篇文章准确地提炼了要点、做到了精确的对应匹配、逻辑性强、语言水平高即可。
以上就是GRE ISSUE作文的评分标准和分析解读，希望大家能够参照上文内容，对自己的作文备考工作进行完善，做好充分准备，争取在考试中写出高分满分的优秀ISSUE作文。
TIPS：写GRE作文几大禁忌
1. GRE作文不能写很口语化的表达，因为这是学术性写作，口语化会显得你词汇掌握不足，无法区分书面用语和口头用语
2. 不能千篇 一律的短句或者散句，而要长短结合，主次分明。
3. 同一词汇不要反复使用。要在文章中体现出自己的词汇量。在遇到重复概念的时候不能反复使用同一个词汇来表达，多使用意思相近的其他词汇或表达方式，会让文章更加多彩。
GRE写作高分技巧：遣词造句实例改写
一、避免使用语意弱的“be”动词
1、把句中的表语转换为不同的修饰语。例如：
原文：The trees are bare. The grass is brown. The landscape seems drab.
改写：The brown grass and bare trees form a drab landscape. (转换为前置定语)Or: The landscape, bare and brown, begged for spring green. (转换为并列结构作后置定语)
2、将作表语用的形容词或名词变为行为动词。例如：
1) 原文：The team members are good players.
改写：The team members play well.
2) 原文：One worker's plan is the elimination of tardiness.
改写：One worker's plan eliminates tardiness.
3、在以“here”或“there”开头的句子中，把“be”动词后的名词代词变成改写句的主语。例如：
1) 原文：There is no opportunity for promotion.
改写：No opportunity for promotion exists.
2) 原文：Here are the books you ordered.
改写：The books you ordered have arrived.
二、多用语意具体的动词，保持句意简洁明了
例如：
1、原文：My supervisor went past my desk.
改写：My supervisor sauntered (=walked slowly) past my desk.
2、原文：She is a careful shopper.
改写：She compares prices and quality.
三、尽量运用主动语态
例如：
1、原文：The organization has been supported by charity.
改写：Charity has supported the organization.
2、原文：The biscuits were stacked on a plate.
改写：Mother stacked the biscuits on a plate.
四、防止使用语意冗长累赘的词语
例如：
1、原文：My little sister has a preference for chocolate milk.
改写：My little sister prefers chocolate milk.
2、原文：We are in receipt of your letter and intend to follow your recommendations.
改写：We have received your letter and intended to follow your recommendation.
3、原文：We had a serious crisis at school yesterday when our chemistry laboratory caught fire.
改写：We had a crisis at school yesterday when our chemistry laboratory caught fire.
4、原文：My sister and I bought the same, identical dress in different stores.
改写：My sister and I bought the same dress in different stores.
五、杜绝滥用陈旧词语或难懂的专业术语
例如：
1、原文：They will not agree to his proposals in any shape or form.
改写：They will not agree to any of his proposals.
2、原文：I need her financial input before I can guesstimate our expenditures next fall.
改写：I need her financial figures before I can estimate our expenditures next fall.
GRE写作ISSUE作文怎么写?四点建议分享
篇16：备考资料:GMAT优秀作文欣赏
备考资料:GMAT优秀作文欣赏
备考资料:GMAT优秀作文
The conclusion of this argument is that 15-year-olds should be eligible to obtain a drivers license. The author employs two lines of reasoning to reach this conclusion. In the first the author reasons that since older drivers can retain their driving privileges by simply renewing their licenses, 15-year-olds should be eligible to obtain a license. In the second, the author reasons that 15-year-olds are physically more capable than older drivers of performing the various skills associated with driving s vehicle and thus should be eligible to get a license. This argument is unconvincing for a couple of reasons.
In the first place, the author assumes that there are no relevant differences between 15-year-olds and older drivers that would justify treating them differently. This assumption is dearly mistaken. The major difference between the two groups, and the major reason 15-year-olds are denied driving privileges, is their relative lack of emotional maturity and social responsibility. This difference is sufficient to justify the policy of a owing older drivers to renew their driving privileges while at the same time denying these privileges to 15-year-olds.
In the second place, even if it is granted that fifteen year olds possess better night vision, reflexes, hand-eye coordination, and are less disoriented in unfamiliar surroundings than older drivers, these abilities do not qualify them to obtain a drivers license. The author assumes that physical capabilities are the only attributes necessary to operate a motor vehicle. But this assumption is clearly mistaken. In addition to these abilities, drivers must be able to exercise good judgment in all types of driving situations and conditions and must be cognizant of the consequences of their decisions and actions when driving. It is because 15-year-olds typically lack these latter abilities that they are denied driving privileges.
篇17：GRE写作ISSUE作文审题破题展开方法
GRE写作ISSUE官方要求介绍
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
从这个instructions可以看出，我们绝不能单纯地从正负观点去展开文章。因为，它明确说了你需要在写作中讨论“命题”中的陈述在何种情况下成立“true”,在何种情况下不成立”not hold true”.如果你在写作时仍然持有单一观点，你最后的得分可想而知。但是，实际情况是，对于大多数中国考生来讲，他们往往受困于单一观点“黑白分明”的思维定式，不善于从多角度分析一个问题。而这里各位考生需要明白，ETS对于GRE高分作文有一个很重要也是最基本的要求，那就是complexity,也就是“立场和角度的多样化”。为了去应对这样的写作要求，小站教育老师在这里介绍几种实用且又符合instructions要求的破题方式。
篇18：GRE写作ISSUE作文审题破题展开方法
很多题目总是会列出两个对象，接受一个抛弃另一个，这个时候可以找寻题设中两个认为对立的对象之间的联系，指出两者是共存的。
例如：It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.
1.艺术品本身实际上就有很深刻的内涵和永恒的价值，同时批评家可以让大家明白艺术品的价值在哪里。
2. 那些流传远久有永恒价值的艺术都是批评家们帮助筛选出来的。
因此，这两个对象是不矛盾的。
篇19：GRE写作ISSUE作文审题破题展开方法
很多题目的key point就在于如何定义关键词，题目给出的概念不够明晰的时候，可以有不同的理解，而不同的理解就可以有不同的方向破题。
例如：“facts are stubborn things. They cannot be altered by our wishes, or our inclinations.”
我们可以看出，本题中的 “facts”意义就非常模糊。因此，我们可以通过对于其不同定义来题目。
1.如果fact作为一种自然客观规律，这样的fact是我们无法改变的，比如所有的生物终将死亡。时间是不能倒退的，这些是我们通过亲身感受可以感知到的，无论怎么努力，这些事实是不可能改变的。
2.如果把fact理解为记录的史实，那么fact是有可能改变的。诚然发生过的事情不可以改变，但是历史本来就不可能完全真实的记录已经发生的事实。这样的情况下“fact”很多时候都是被改变的。
GRE写作：高分冲刺
1.要有可以模仿的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。
2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。
3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。
怎么模仿，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。
具体化的能力
具体化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个具体的意向。通过具体的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。具体化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。
为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。
你通过不断地模仿写作，就可以不断地纠正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和具体结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，如果你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。
分析完一篇文章后，怎么模仿着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文对照一下，看看是谁写得漂亮。我刚刚开始模仿写作的时候发现，模仿了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。
因为根据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。如果一个单词可以经常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明了一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不可能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在模仿文章时写过这个字。如果一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。
通过不断地模仿你的几大能力就会得到提高：
1.你的语法错误会越来越少;
2.句子结构能力越来越强;
3.用词能力大大增加。
GRE作文分数在你的留学考试中分量多重?
虽然各个大学的教授有自己对于GRE成绩的理解，尽管TOEFL和GRE是申请因素里的一个而已，但是根据相关的经验显示，很多教授很看重申请者的GRE考试的作文成绩(W)和语文成绩(V)，这些是保证申请者顺利完成其美国学业的基础。
在美国大学申请中，一些大学的研究生院，例如教育学、社会学等文科专业对GRE作文分数做了5分这样的单科要求，这些足以说明GRE写作的重要性。
- issue可数吗2023-05-25
- GRE写作高分ISSUE立论文开头段写法2024-08-09
- GMAT考试作文点评分析及2022-12-28
- GRE英语作文分类题库―ISSUE2025-03-05
- 优秀写作范文2023-01-10
- 有关法制教育的优秀作文写作2024-07-11
- GMAT考试中满分作文达成的方法2022-12-24
- 提高GMAT数学成绩的策略英语作文2025-02-22
- 事业单位写作优秀范文2024-07-08
- 优秀毕业生求职信写作2024-08-18