英语六级口试攻略

时间:2025年03月09日

/

来源:杰茗枝

/

编辑:本站小编

收藏本文

下载本文

下面小编给大家整理英语六级口试攻略,本文共6篇,希望大家喜欢!本文原稿由网友“杰茗枝”提供。

篇1:英语六级口试攻略

英语六级口试攻略

一、考试介绍

1、考试对象:

大学英语四、六级考试口语考试(CET Spoken English Test ,简称 CET-SET)用于考察大学生运用英语进行口头交际的能力。CET-SET 报考对象为获得全国大学英语四、六级证书且成绩达到一定分数线的在校大学生。

教育部规定,四级笔试550分、六级520分以上的考生可以报名参加口试。

2、考试时间及地点:

四、六级口语考试为一年两次,分别在5月和11月。考试地点在考生报名的考点,具体考场在考生报名后随机编组确定。

3、报名流程:

全国大学英语四、六级考试委员会根据教育部主管部门的文件规定,在有关城市设立若干个考点。考生到所在考试中心指定的考点报名并参加考试,报名时须随身携带身份证、二寸报名照一张及报名费用。

注意事项

考生须携带本人的准考证和身份证准时到规定的候考室报到,逾时 15 分钟不得进考场。

考生如发现准考证上的姓名有误,请在正式开考前将修改后的准考证交给主考,由主考按身份证上的姓名核对并签名确认。

如中途无故退场,将作自动放弃考试处理,成绩一律记为不合格。

自备饮料;不得携带手机、拷机等通讯工具进入候考室。

考生须在候考室等候参加考试,在候考期间未经同意不得随意离开候考室。

考试期间,必须遵守考场纪律,服从管理人员安排。

考试结束时,必须将准考证交给主考,同时记下自己的准考证号。

考试结束后,必须立即离开考区。

4、考试形式及试题构成:

CET-SET 考试采用面对面的形式,每场考试由 2 名主考和 3 (或 4 )名考生组成

CET-SET 考试分三部分:

第一部分是考生和 CET 授权的主考进行交谈,采用问答的形式。时间约 5 分钟。包括考生自我介绍、回答问题等。

第二部分包括 1.5 分钟的考生个人发言和 4.5 分钟的小组讨论。时间共约 10 分钟。

第三部分由主考再次提问以进一步确定考生的口头交际能力,由主考老师进一步提问。时间约 5 分钟。

5、考试成绩及合格证书:

口语考试成绩合格者由教育部高等教育司发给证书,证书分为 A、B 、C 三个等级,C等以上者将获得由教育部高教司颁发的注有CET Spoken English Test成绩等级的 CET 证书,成绩低于 C 等的不发给证书。

大学英语四、六级考试口语考试能力等级标准如下:

等级描述

A 等 能用英语就熟悉的题材进行口头交际,基本上没有困难

B 等 能用英语就熟悉的题材进行口头交际,虽有些困难,但不影响交际

C 等 能用英语就熟悉的题材进行简单的口头交际

D 等 尚不具有英语口头交际能力

6、评分标准采集者退散

CET-SET 主考在评分时使用以下标准:

a. 准确性 指考生的语音、语调以及所使用的语法和词汇的准确程度

b. 语言范围 指考生使用的词汇和语法结构的复杂程度和范围

c. 话语的长短 指考生对整个考试中的交际所作的贡献、讲话的多少

d. 连贯性 指考生有能力进行较长时间的、语言连贯的发言

e. 灵活性 指考生应付不同情景和话题的能力

f. 适切性 指考生根据不同场合选用适当确切的语言的能力

二、备考指导

1、准备一个有特色的自我介绍,给老师留下好印象。

考试一开始就是个自我介绍,最好有特色一点,因为这关系到给老师的第一印象,你在第一时间内所展现出来的个性特征很可能在主考老师的心里持续到最后一分钟。如果不能给老师留下好印象,即使你在之后的环节做的非常优秀,把你们同组的三个人在老师心中的印象重新排序仍是有些困难的。所有一个有特色的自我介绍十分重要。

2、对当前的热门或和学习相关的话题要有所准备和熟悉。比如奥运会,世博,低碳,环保等。

3、与老师交流一定要专心。

和老师的交流一般比cet6w.com,因为老师的提问一般是针对你的陈述引出来的问题,所以不要因为紧张而乱了方寸。

4、加强口语交流练习,表述内容要有条理。

平时练习时,最好是多看和多练一下历年的口语考试题目,可以找周围朋友或是社交活动的时候跟搭档练习一下找找感觉。每周都参与的话相信你的口语考试定能顺利通关。

1.英语六级口试报名条件

2.12月英语六级口试大纲

3.大学英语六级考试口试文章练习

4.2017英语六级备考攻略

5.英语六级“抱佛脚”备考攻略

6.6月英语六级备考攻略

7.英语六级快速阅读攻略

8.英语六级阅读攻略详解

9.2017英语六级备考攻略及具体方法

10.2016英语六级考试小攻略

篇2:英语六级口试练习题

The war between Britain and France

In the late eighteenth century, battles raged in almost every corner of Europe, as well as in the Middle East, south Africa ,the West Indies, and Latin America. In reality, however, there was only one major war during this time, the war between Britain and France. All other battles were ancillary to this larger conflict, and were often at least partially related to its antagonist’ goals and strategies. France sought total domination of Europe . this goal was obstructed by British independence and Britain’s efforts throughout the continent to thwart Napoleon; through treaties. Britain built coalitions (not dissimilar in concept to today’s NATO) guaranteeing British participation in all major European conflicts. These two antagonists were poorly matched, insofar as they had very unequal strengths; France was predominant on land, Britain at sea. The French knew that, short of defeating the British navy, their only hope of victory was to close all the ports of Europe to British ships. Accordingly, France set out to overcome Britain by extending its military domination from Moscow t Lisbon, from Jutland to Calabria. All of this entailed tremendous risk, because France did not have the military resources to control this much territory and still protect itself and maintain order at home.

French strategists calculated that a navy of 150 ships would provide the force necessary to defeat the British navy. Such a force would give France a three-to-two advantage over Britain. This advantage was deemed necessary because of Britain’s superior sea skills and technology because of Britain’s superior sea skills and technology, and also because Britain would be fighting a defensive war, allowing it to win with fewer forces. Napoleon never lost substantial impediment to his control of Europe. As his force neared that goal, Napoleon grew increasingly impatient and began planning an immediate attack.

Evolution of sleep

Sleep is very ancient. In the electroencephalographic sense we share it with all the primates and almost all the other mammals and birds: it may extend back as far as the reptiles.

There is some evidence that the two types of sleep, dreaming and dreamless, depend on the life-style of the animal, and that predators are statistically much more likely to dream than prey, which are in turn much more likely to experience dreamless sleep. In dream sleep, the animal is powerfully immobilized and remarkably unresponsive to external stimuli. Dreamless sleep is much shallower, and we have all witnessed cats or dogs cocking their ears to a sound when apparently fast asleep. The fact that deep dream sleep is rare among pray today seems clearly to be a product of natural selection, and it makes sense that today, when sleep is highly evolved, the stupid animals are less frequently immobilized by deep sleep than the smart ones. But why should they sleep deeply at all? Why should a state of such deep immobilization ever have evolved?

Perhaps one useful hint about the original function of sleep is to be found in the fact that dolphins and whales and aquatic mammals in genera seem to sleep very little. There is, by and large, no place to hide in the ocean. Could it be that, rather than increasing an animal’s vulnerability, the University of Florida and Ray Meddis of London University have suggested this to be the case. It is conceivable that animals who are too stupid to be quite on their own initiative are, during periods of high risk, immobilized by the implacable arm of sleep. The point seems particularly clear for the young of predatory animals. This is an interesting notion and probably at least partly true.

Modern American Universities

Before the 1850’s, the United States had a number of small colleges, most of them dating from colonial days. They were small, church connected institutions whose primary concern was to shape the moral character of their students.

Throughout Europe, institutions of higher learning had developed, bearing the ancient name of university. In German university was concerned primarily with creating and spreading knowledge, not morals. Between mid-century and the end of the 1800’s, more than nine thousand young Americans, dissatisfied with their training at home, went to Germany for advanced study. Some of them return to become presidents of venerable colleges-----Harvard, Yale, Columbia ---and transform them into modern universities. The new presidents broke all ties with the churches and brought in a new kind of faculty. Professors were hired for their knowledge of a subject, not because they were of the proper faith and had a strong arm for disciplining students. The new principle was that a university was to create knowledge as well as pass it on, and this called for a faculty composed of teacher-scholars. Drilling and learning by rote were replaced by the German method of lecturing, in which the professor’s own research was presented in class. Graduate training leading to the Ph.D., an ancient German degree signifying the highest level of advanced scholarly attainment, was introduced. With the establishment of the seminar system, graduate student learned to question, analyze, and conduct their own research.

At the same time, the new university greatly expanded in size and course offerings, breaking completely out of the old, constricted curriculum of mathematics, classics, rhetoric, and music. The president of Harvard pioneered the elective system, by which students were able to choose their own course of study. The notion of major fields of study emerged. The new goal was to make the university relevant to the real pursuits of the world. Paying close heed to the practical needs of society, the new universities trained men and women to work at its tasks, with engineering students being the most characteristic of the new regime. Students were also trained as economists, architects, agriculturalists, social welfare workers, and teachers.

children’s numerical skills

people appear to born to compute. The numerical skills of children develop so early and so inexorably that it is easy to imagine an internal clock of mathematical maturity guiding their growth. Not long after learning to walk and talk, they can set the table with impress accuracy---one knife, one spoon, one fork, for each of the five chairs. Soon they are capable of nothing that they have placed five knives, spoons and forks on the table and, a bit later, that this amounts to fifteen pieces of silverware. Having thus mastered addition, they move on to subtraction. It seems almost reasonable to expect that if a child were secluded on a desert island at birth and retrieved seven years later, he or she could enter a second enter a second-grade mathematics class without any serious problems of intellectual adjustment.

Of course, the truth is not so simple. This century, the work of cognitive psychologists has illuminated the subtle forms of daily learning on which intellectual progress depends. Children were observed as they slowly grasped-----or, as the case might be, bumped into-----concepts that adults take for quantity is unchanged as water pours from a short glass into a tall thin one. Psychologists have since demonstrated that young children, asked to count the pencils in a pile, readily report the number of blue or red pencils, but must be coaxed into finding the total. Such studies have suggested that the rudiments of mathematics are mastered gradually, and with effort. They have also suggested that the very concept of abstract numbers------the idea of a oneness,

a twoness , a threeness that applies to any class of objects and is a prerequisite for doing anything more mathematically demanding than setting a table-----is itself far from innate

The Historical Significance of American Revolution

The ways of history are so intricate and the motivations of human actions so complex that it is always hazardous to attempt to represent events covering a number of years, a multiplicity of persons, and distant localities as the expression of one intellectual or social movement; yet the historical process which culminated in the ascent of Thomas Jefferson to the presidency can be regarded as the outstanding example not only of the birth of a new way of life but of nationalism as a new way of life. The American Revolution represents the link between the seventeenth century, in which modern England became conscious of itself, and the awakening of modern Europe at the end of the eighteenth century. It may seem strange that the march of history should have had to cross the Atlantic Ocean, but only in the North American colonies could a struggle for civic liberty lead also to the foundation of a new nation. Here, in the popular rising against a “tyrannical” government, the fruits were more than the securing of a freer constitution. They included the growth of a nation born in liberty by the will of the people, not from the roots of common descent, a geographic entity, or the ambitions of king or dynasty. With the American nation, for the first time, a nation was born, not in the dim past of history but before the eyes of the whole world.

1.英语六级口试攻略

2.大学英语六级口试备考技巧

3.月英语六级口试大纲

4.2017英语六级口试报名条件

5.英语六级练习题

6.英语六级听力练习题目

7.英语六级听力的练习题

8.20大学英语六级考试口试文章练习

9.英语六级段落匹配练习题

10.英语六级翻译练习题:端午节

篇3:高级口译考试口试攻略

Great to see the article I’d written on the role of charities in health published this morning. It reads well (he says modestly!). Here it is in case you missed it;

Charities can offer better service than the NHS

Stop arguing over private or public delivery on health and choose what is best for patients

St John’s Hospital in Bath was established in 1180 to provide healing and homes by the bubbling spa springs for the poor and infirm. The charity is still there 830 years later: a much valued health and care service for the elderly.

This demonstrates our country’s great charitable tradition in health. The Government’s desire to put citizens and patients first is both core to the current health reforms and a guiding mission for the country’s great charities and social enterprises. The words of the Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, “no decision about me, without me”, are our driving passion.

We have a dual role: to deliver health services, undertake research and provide care and compassion to those most in need; and to act as an advocate and adviser. We are sometimes a challenger of the health establishment and always a doughty champion for patients.

For these reforms to be a success we must ensure a much stronger role for the third sector. That is why we strongly support the policy of “any willing provider”. The previous Government was profoundly mistaken in pursuing a policy of the NHS as “preferred provider”, which implied that services from our sector were less valued than the State’s. In fact, through a big expansion of the role of charities and social enterprises in providing care, we can provide more cost-effective and citizen-focused services.

This is not about privatisation. What matters is what is delivered, not who delivers it. This must be at the heart of health service reform.

Charities can offer a better deal in so many ways. In the NHS spent just over 0.05 per cent of its healthcare budget through charities. In other words this is a virtually untapped resource waiting to be used.

To me, competition in the NHS means British Red Cross volunteers being able to help more people to adapt to life at home after a lengthy spell in hospital, so preventing the need for readmission. Those who get this support are often aged over 65 and have experienced a fall. Volunteers bring them home, settle them in, advise neighbours or relatives of their return, check on pets, help to prepare a meal and make a further visit to ensure that they are safe and well. Such schemes can save the typical NHS commissioner up to £1 million a year.

Competition in the NHS would also mean an environmental charity such as BTCV running more “green gyms”, which give people a physical workout while taking part in environmental projects. So far, more than 10,000 people ― often referred by GPs ― have taken part. An evaluation found that the positive impact on mental and physical health, not to mention the acquisition of new skills, means that the State saves £153 for every £100 it invests. On top of that, it has a positive impact on local communities and the environment. Do we want less of this or more? I suspect that for most of us the answer is obvious.

Those who rely most on the NHS are the vulnerable, the very people charities were set up to help, precisely because they were being let down by the status quo. If groups such as the Red Cross and BTCV can do a better job than the NHS, we should let them.

Promoting wellbeing and preventing ill health have for too long been neglected aspects of the NHS’s role. These reforms rightly put emphasis on public health. Giving a role in health back to local councils is long overdue. The new health and wellbeing boards may provide the opportunity to get more resources behind public health as well as, for the first time, giving elected councillors the chance to scrutinise NHS resources. Preventing diabetes through better education, diet and exercise is always a better approach than picking up the costs of a growing number of people with diabetes. Charities such as Diabetes UK, working with councils and GPs, are critical to achieving that.

Of course there are challenges in introducing reforms. Of course proper funding is crucial. We want to ensure that there is a strategic approach to commissioning, including national guidelines. We want the new GP consortia to take full advantage of the opportunity to expand their work with our sector.

The challenge we face as a country is to build on the sure foundations of our NHS to provide service that recognises and expands the work of charities, promotes partnerships between State, third and private sectors and moves on from arcane arguments over privatisation.

And The Times also had a brilliant summary of the problems of Big Society and how to solve them by Phil Collins and a great letter from my Chair in response to the Francis Maude MP article.

I’m blogging from H M Treasury where the Prime Minister has been announcing new procurement and commissioning arrangements to free up the process for SMEs and charities and social enterprises. He was clear that we are part of the SME community and contracting has to be changed so that we can bid easier and better. He must have mentioned charities some 10 times in his speech and even referred to me directly. Then shook my hand on the way out! I made the point to him that we welcome the initiatives and I referred to Chris White MP’s Social Clause Bill and how important that is.

And now the weekend beckons. Though I’m spending Sunday morning on Sky News. There you go; no rest for the wicked!

篇4:高级口译考试口试攻略

John Lewis: never knowingly undersold?

It is possibly the most famous promise in British retailing: “Never knowingly undersold” has been at the heart of John Lewis’s business since 1925. But a quietly introduced change has infuriated loyal customers, who claim the price-match promise is now slipping away.

For many years John Lewis customers have been safe in the knowledge that if they found their purchase for a lower price elsewhere the company would refund the difference. Carrier bags and marketing campaigns have proudly proclaimed to the world that John Lewis won’t be beaten on price.

Yet since September some customers who have asked John Lewis to match the price of goods found cheaper elsewhere on the high street have been turned away.

A Guardian Money reader from Roydon, Essex, contacted us after he bought a Hotpoint washing machine in John Lewis’s Welwyn store for £279. A few days later he saw the same model in Argos for £219 ? £60 cheaper. John Lewis turned down his claim made under the never knowingly undersold policy, because it said it guaranteed the washing machines for two years, while Argos offered only one year.

The customer complained ? unsuccessfully ? that the store wasn’t being fair as this was not made clear in the literature.

When Money investigated, we found that John Lewis had made a fundamental change to its policy.

In a statement in September, which at the time drew positive headlines, it said it would for the first time match online prices from other retailers as long as they also had a physical high street presence. What was made less clear was that the store would no longer match a price unless its rival offers the exact same warranty.

The policy change might not sound much, but it in effect allows the store to avoid almost all price matching of electrical items ? because John Lewis has adopted a policy of offering two-year warranties on almost every such item. Most stores in the UK offer just one year.

When we first raised the reader’s complaint with John Lewis it told us: “As part of our commitment to be never knowingly undersold, we match prices based on the combined cost of the product plus charges the competitor may make for a comparable warranty or guarantee. We evaluate price-match claims on a like-for-like basis, and breakdown cover is a crucial part of our proposition to our customers.”

What it failed to mention was that prior to the September policy rewrite, it would have paid the complainant the £60 difference between the John Lewis and Argos washing machines.

Interestingly, the store confirmed it would not price match the cost of buying a product plus a warranty from a third party company, but would consider a claim if the cheaper retailer offered the chance to buy both together.

David Suddock, head of buying support at John Lewis, who revised the policy, says: “As a result of our commitment to expand our never knowingly undersold policy to include other retailers with online presences we now put a great deal of resources into checking the prices charged by our rivals and lowering ours where appropriate. Our customers are benefiting through significantly reduced prices. They tell us they value the extra warranty periods we offer, and we think it is only fair we should include that in our price match scheme. The terms of the never knowingly undersold policy are clearly presented in both our stores and on the website.”

But if the Money postbag is to be believed, most John Lewis customers were unaware of the change. And Martyn Hocking, editor of Which? says: “John Lewis is known for its great customer service, so the change to its never knowingly undersold policy is very disappointing. Customers would naturally expect any price matching policy to relate to the up-front cost of a product, excluding the value of added extras such as warranties and guarantees. As such, we feel that the amended policy is misleading and will lead to frustration for many shoppers.”

But Natalie Berg, research director at retail analysts Planet Retail, says John Lewis’s move was perhaps inevitable: “The internet has put the power to compare prices in the hands of all of us; some shoppers now use smart phones to check prices as they walk around a store. John Lewis has realised that while price is important, it’s not the factor in where to buy. The fact that John Lewis has been one of the winners on the high street in recent months suggests consumers are not just looking for the lowest prices, but they want value ? and the perception is that John Lewis delivers this.”

篇5:英语六级阅读攻略详解

遇到六级阅读,很多童鞋不觉心塞。一心塞难读;二心塞太长;三心塞题不会做,真的是“三塞骚年”。不要紧,我们有救治心塞的解药哦,当然是高分攻略啦!

长篇阅读题(即段落信息匹配题)

这个题型是改革后的新题型,考生一开始接触肯定会有些不适应。考试时一定要注意时间的控制,不要影响了后面的答题时间。

长篇阅读题答题时要从两方面入手:

1、先看题再看文章,能够将更多简单的题先做出来,简单题全部处理完毕之后,剩下的难题可以再重新回到文章当中再去找那些已经被挑剩下的段落。

2、关键词定位:特别注意题干中的数字、特殊的人名地名等,在原文中很可能换到直接对应的。

仔细阅读题(即我们熟知的选择题)

1. 认真阅读五道题,确定题型,找出关键词;

2. 粗略浏览文章,确定每道题目的位置;

3. 定位明确区域,对比选项,切忌过度推导;

4. 注意区域中举例、标点、转折等语言现象;

5. 每篇文章做题时间10-12分钟

拓展阅读:

英语六级阅读注意

1.抓紧时间

四六级考试的时间是非常宝贵的,因为题量很大,几乎一听完听力,考试就没剩下多少时间了,所以后面留给阅读的时间就很少了,不少考生下来之后都会说自己的阅读没做完,是如何如何的惨。其实,真正能够把所有的题目都做完的,毕竟是少数。但是不做肯定没有分,多做一题至少能多一些拿分的可能。那我们该怎么样才能多做多拿分呢?这取决于平时的练习,也就是说,平时在训练的时候就要有紧张的时间概念,不能慢悠悠的做,做到什么时候算什么时候,这是不科学的。只有平时在训练时就严格按照时间掐表做题,根据自己的情况,合理安排做题时间和顺序,先做简单的题目,难的题目放到后面,这样上了考场的时候才能更快的适应考场的节奏,尽快进入状态,游刃有余的去解题。

2.明确做题思路

在做阅读的时候,我们要有自己的方法,不同的人方法或许不太一样,但适合自己就好。在这里,文都英语老师将根据小伙伴们的情况,总结出一套做阅读的方法,供大家参考。

找准信息词

四六级的阅读通常很长,我们不能一上来就开始读文章,因为文章太长,等你读完了,可能你也忘记了文章到底讲的是什么了。那我们应该怎么办呢?文都英语老师建议,我们先根据题干找到信息词。信息词,其实也就是我们常说的定位词,其作用就是

帮助我们迅速返回原文定位。信息词,一般是时间、人名、地名、组织机构名,或者是其他包含具体信息的词。

返回原文

根据这些信息词,我们可以快速返回原文定位,锁定信息词所在的句子,进行仔细解读。但是,我们要注意,这个句子里面的词和信息词有时候是原词再现,但有的时候可能就是它的近义词、近义词组或者是用不同的句型来表达同一个含义,要注意辨别,但这些辨别就有赖于平时学习过程中的积累了。

仔细比对

在理解了句子的含义后,再去看四个选项,看哪个选项的内容和原文表达的最为接近,那这个选项就是本题的正确答案。

篇6:英语六级临时抱佛脚备考攻略

英语六级考试战役已经打响,那么,如何在这最后的关头进行快速复习,并同时把握重点呢?

一、听力、阅读多多练

听力攻略:

老生常谈“得听力、阅读高分者,得天下!”因此,听力和阅读每周至少保证一定的时间。听力每周保证2-3次,30分钟以上的泛听和精听。

A 泛听:

只要是英语,不管是歌曲、美剧、广播、新闻还是演讲、对话、英语美文欣赏,都可以让它们在你的耳边响起,然后至少要看着听力原文,边听边看1次。

B 精听:

就是去听写,完成一个任务。1分钟的材料,也能用30分钟去把每个字都听懂,写下来。精听建议四级选择教育类、故事类和文化类;六级选择文化类、商务职场类和科普类等近年来常考的类型去练。

阅读攻略:

阅读要能够保证每天看1篇英语文章,消灭中间的生单词和长难句!阅读体裁选择议论文、说明文;题材选择教育校园与大家息息相关的文章;经济类和社会类,选择一些英美热点和有争议的话题。

四、六级外刊常考来源:TIME,New York Times, The Guardian等。

二、翻译、写作多动笔

对于翻译和写作,一定要多动笔!

翻译一方面要积累分类词汇和表达,主要是中国的文化、经济、历史等方面的词汇。另一方面要先自己翻,翻译完后,看答案;隔3-5天,再试着凭答案的模糊印象,再翻1次。直到自己能接近参考译文,才进入下1篇的练习。

写作主要是把近3年的作文都写1次。写完以后,自己注意修改、检查。至少要保证没有单词拼写、语法错误。而且,相信在写的过程中,自然而然就会有针对性地发现自己哪些词汇、表达不会,赶紧补救、背诵下来!

对于基础相对较弱的同学,先尝试把中文至少读2-3遍,读完以后,采取每天尝试翻对1-2句,一周翻译好一整篇的节奏去练翻译。

翻译每句话的时候,先注意把句子拆分成单词、短语、表达。然后再对照答案,把答案对应的单词等用小笔记本抄下来,反复查看。等到一周结束,再完全合上笔记本,把一整篇文章从头到尾,试着控制时间,在30分钟内做完!

大学英语六级考试报考指南:口试大纲

口试故宫导游词

英语六级的复习计划

英语六级范文

雅思英语口试自我介绍模板

下载英语六级口试攻略(集锦6篇)
英语六级口试攻略.doc
将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
推荐度:
点击下载文档
点击下载本文文档